Atomic Honey
  • Home
  • Garden Updates
  • The Mythological History Of Atomic Honey
  • Operation: Moondust Song Lyrics
  • Blog
  • Return To The Sacred Garden
  • Pizza Dude Sez
  • Songs And Their Stories

Kev's Thoughts

Thoughts from Kev Atomic that would take too many tweets to convey-sometimes random, but often related to music and/or the industry.

Home

Balance & The Exchange of Energy

3/22/2013

3 Comments

 
I think a lot about balance in our lives and the possible ways to achieve it. I'm no expert in any sort of way except that-like many of you, most likely-I've worked hard much of my life to accomplish this great task, and have learned a few tricks along the way.


I like to imagine our lives as a pendulum-when the shiny balls are at rest, I am at rest-I've found that balance if only temporary. It never takes long, however, for the pendulum to get set into motion again, and the little roller coaster ride begins all over again. There was a time I thought this was a bad thing-that I still hadn't learned balance. I thought that if I'd really "mastered" this balance that the shiny balls would always just stay at rest-or very close to at rest-and would never swing that high in either direction. 


But then one day, I thought about the work of an artist (I am a musician, for those that don't know), and how much of that art comes as the direct result of a very active pendulum-all the way up on one side,  down quickly, then high up on the other side. Somehow something "clicked" inside me, and I became aware that there was some sort of energy that came from this pendulum swing-a creative energy. And though I hesitated to call this erratic shift a "good thing," there was no question it was at the very least a constructive thing and quite useful if one wishes to be artistically productive.


I also noticed that if the pendulum is placed on a sturdy, level surface, the shiny ball in the center never actually moves-it simply takes the energy from the two shiny balls on one side and transfers it to the two shiny balls on the other side. This seemed important to me. It was then I began considering what "balance" in our lives really means-that it doesn't necessarily mean all the shiny balls are at rest-only the one  in the middle.


Perhaps both sets of shiny balls on either side of the motionless one in the center could be thought of as light and dark, good and evil, depression and mania, love and hate, or any other sorts of opposites we confront in life. At the risk of sounding "cheesy" I couldn't help but think of the Star Wars philosophy of "balance in the force." 


What I ended up discovering even later in life, which many of you on Twitter have heard me say, is that love is an energy exchange-it truly is. We all experience various trials in our lives, and sometimes we share them with others, sometimes we absorb them from others. Sometimes that process of sharing or absorbing them harms us, sometimes it heals us-there are no guarantees when it comes to human interaction one way or the other. The constant we seem to have-if we'll choose to make it our focal point-is that shiny ball in the middle. Call it Love, call it one's heart, one's spirit, soul, or even God or what have you-but it seems to me that's the only one we truly have to concern ourselves with. As long as that shiny ball in the middle stays motionless, everything's gonna be okay-that's how I feel nowadays.


That was very good news for this empathic musician the world has decided to call "Kev." It didn't take me long to realize that keeping that shiny ball in the middle at rest was a very simple thing-in fact one needs do nothing at all to keep it there, other than to keep that pendulum we call "life" rested upon a sturdy, level surface. Perhaps that sturdy, level surface is love itself; the very thing (and maybe the ONLY thing) all religions, philosophies, and belief systems seem to have in common as a good, proper, and necessary thing. 


I no longer concern myself with the shiny balls on either side of the motionless center: as the highs and lows enter my life in various forms, I will find ways to funnel those emotions into creative & constructive outlets (such as this spontaneous blog, for instance). I will find joy in knowing that the natural state of the shiny ball in the center is to be at rest, that it needs no effort on my part to stay there. As was said in a famous rock song "...roll with the punches and get to what's real." (I'll let you google that for yourselves if you need to, though I'm hoping many of you will hear the song in your head right away).


Thank you all always and again for your amazing love and support!


Kev
oxox



3 Comments

The Great Gig In the Digital Sky

3/16/2013

1 Comment

 
Tonight's blog is directed toward fellow musicians, though I hope some non-musicians can enjoy some of its content as well (and, of course, comments & thoughts are welcome from all!):


It occurs to me tonight that social networking for musicians might not be all that different from playing a gig, and that musicians might even find it helpful to think of it as such. Allow me to elaborate...


There are more social networking outlets than I could ever name, but I'm going to use Twitter as my example since it's the one I use 97% of the time, and the format I'm most familiar with. 


Let's say you have a band, are on Twitter, and are attempting to spread the word about your awesome music to the masses. You want your Twitter followers, of course, to know who you are, that you make music, and that if they'd only give it a listen they'd enjoy at least some of it. Fair enough. But what are you really telling your fans via your Twitter stream? Are you introducing yourself, meeting people, engaging them, or are you just posting links? (be honest with yourself, and stop here for a moment to scroll through your last several tweets). Let's liken this to a gig:


How do you approach your audience at a live show? If your experience is similar to mine, you do much more than just play songs while on stage-you would begin the show by telling the audience who you are, and thank them for taking the time to be there. At some point you'd likely thank the club for having you, and remind the audience to take care of the servers that are taking care of them. You might pause between songs to either give the listeners a bit of back story behind  the song you're about to play, or acknowledge some special guests that are in the audience. Those "special guests" could be friends, family, someone who loaned you equipment, provided food, or just showed you a nice time while you were in their town. You might even, at times, stop in the middle of a song, and encourage the audience to sing a song with you. Above all, you're hoping to have fun as you play the gig, and you want the audience to have a nice time too. I'm hoping most of my fellow musician friends can relate so far.


Now re-read that last paragraph and try and apply that to your social networking sites. If you're only posting links, that's the same thing (in my opinion) as going onstage unannounced, playing several songs with no breaks, then turning around and walking off the stage without saying anything to anyone. If you did this, you'd notice your audience was much smaller at the end of the show than it was when it started. Even on the off-chance that your music was so amazing that people stuck around, they'd leave the show not knowing the name of your band or anything about you other than you have some cool songs. Imagine them trying to tell their friends about your fabulous band the next day:


"Dude I saw the most amazing band last night-they totally rocked!"


"Sweet, who were they?"


"I don't know their name, they never said anything-they just started playing and it was awesome"


"Are they local?"


"I don't know-like I said, they didn't say anything-one of the dudes looked kinda familiar"


Anyway, I think you get my point by now. Even if it's not a perfect analogy or entirely true, I think it would serve a musician well to think of their social networking presence as a "gig." If you want your potential audience to give two craps about what you're doing-even so much that they'd tell others about you-you'd best let them know who you are and show some gratitude to the various people that make such a performance possible. As I've said for many years, being a talented musician and having some good songs isn't enough: never has been, never will be. Image matters whether or not you choose to believe it, and the way you carry yourself affects the way people respond to your music. Whatever your social networking site of choice, you're going to have to do more than post links. 


Hope this makes some sense to some of you. Thank you for taking time to share my microcosm with me.


Kev
oxox



1 Comment

Words & Music: The Merger

3/11/2013

2 Comments

 
Something that seems to surprise a lot of people when I tell them is that music was not my first artistic love, nor did it come naturally to me. Writing-poetry, short stories, etc-is what seemed to come naturally to me, and was really my first creative passion. My father was a musician and tried to get me into music at a young age, but I was busy at that time with my action figures and Matchbox cars, and had no interest. 


I sort of fell back on music when I was 13 years old, while trying to figure out a better way to "fit in" with other kids at school and maybe even become a little popular. I remember approaching my dad and telling him I was ready to learn how to play guitar now. He pointed me to the dusty acoustic guitar that had been in my closet since I was 5, and set me up with a Mel Bay book. I learned to play things like "Old McDonald Had A Farm" and "Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star," and even with those simple single-note exercises, I struggled mightily with my timing. I understood the concept of whole, half, and quarter notes no problem, but couldn't tap my foot properly (as my dad had shown me to do) as I played the songs.


To this day, timing is not a strength of mine, though I continue to improve more and more with each song we write and record. I also was not melodically inclined-that part of my repertoire didn't really come about until my early 30's, as I spent most of my teens and 20's learning how to shred like Ywngie Malmsteen, and play the blues like Muddy Waters (not that I succeeded in that mind you, but that seemed to be the general goal). My melodic deficiencies were overcome mostly by patience and listening to tons of music-and opening myself up to the concept that the song itself is what really mattered-not showing off my personal skill. I started to listen to music I would never have listened to in my youth, and started paying attention to patterns and how these songs were structured. 


Learning about song structure and melody was all very mathematical for me initially-hardly a creative process at all. I'd pick random CD's from my collection and play them all the way through, trying to count the measures and jot down on paper how many measures made up different parts of the song (intro, verse, bridge, chorus, etc), and noted how these structures changed for different types of music.


At some point in my ongoing quest, my affinity for-and natural inclination toward-literature and the writing of words gelled with the musical skills I had slowly refined over time, and a bit of creative magic starting flowing. This was many years before Atomic Honey was born, or even my last band Pitfall (for whom I did a large amount of the songwriting). Even to this day, I'm more inclined to write a poem, short story, or journal entry than I am to write a song-I know this may sound strange to some of you, but it's the truth. You may have guessed by now that many of our songs (I write them all) have stemmed from writings that were never intended to be songs.


My point in all this is that I overcame weaknesses through hard work, dedication, and an open mind, and learned how to merge my learned skills with my natural inclinations. I believe this is something all of us can and should do with our lives. I believe we're creative beings-intended to create things. No one should ever tell themselves "I'm just not artistic," and use that as an excuse to not pursue any sort of creative endeavor that person might enjoy. You don't have to be good at something in order to learn how to do it (kinda defeats the purpose of learning, huh?)-all you need is some patience and dedication. If you work at it long enough, you'll develop a sincere passion for your activity, your learned skills and natural creative inclinations will merge, and you'll someday be making awesome and fabulous art in its truest sense. Always believe in yourself, and never be afraid of failing.


Thank you all for amazing love and support, and have a great week ahead.
Kev
oxox



2 Comments

Babies, Pets, & the New Celebrity

3/6/2013

1 Comment

 
After getting my hands on The Cult's latest album "Choice Of Weapon" a few weeks ago (which is fabulous by the way-I'll be doing a review of it in the near future), I started looking into interviews and reviews of it-most of what I found were with Ian Astbury (singer & primary songwriter for The Cult for the few who don't know).


Ian Astbury's always fascinated me and he always seems to have something intelligent to say. In one of the interviews I found with him, he made an interesting statement about fame nowadays; how it's affected by the internet-especially on YouTube. He said that Warhol's theory of fame being 15 minutes long no longer applies (I'm paraphrasing here), that fame is actually  1:28 minutes long now (I DO remember that specific number for some strange reason). He went on to say that current artists are now competing with things like "kitty flying an airplane" and "cute babies."


Though this should have been obvious to me a long time ago, I just never happened to really think about this. I've often thought about how the line is blurring between those we've considered celebrities over the years, and those whose names we don't know but seem more popular than many names we DO know. I never quite connected the dots like Ian Astbury did so eloquently in his interview (which is why he's Ian Astbury, and I'm not, I guess).


After hearing Ian's statements, I started thinking that perhaps we're all unknowingly in the process of redefining the term "celebrity." How DO we define one, by the way? Surely someone with 1.5 million Twitter followers must be a celebrity-but so many fall into that category and we don't know their names or even what they "DO." Someone with 5 million hits on their YouTube vid HAS to be a celebrity, right? Heck, it might not even be a person-or a living organism. As an example, I love YouTube vids of talking ravens and cool stuff done with Lego's. I don't know the names of the people who make and/or upload these vids-I only know I enjoy watching them. Oh, there are some awesome ones too I enjoy of a dude who does prank calls using hand puppets of Sesame St characters and imitates their voices on the phone (The Count calling an Asian restaurant is one of my faves)-again I don't know the dude's name or what he does for a living-I doubt he's getting paid for calling people with his hand puppets.


Anyhoo, this was quite a revelation for little ole narcissistic me-we're not competing against the industry as independent artists, we're competing against gratification of the most instant kind-on many thick levels. How are we going to get people to watch our videos and listen to our songs when they have so many kittens, babies, Lego's, and talking ravens to watch? I haven't made it far enough along in this thought process to offer any answers, and a part of me is thinking maybe there simply aren't any. Perhaps the age of the "celebrity" as we understood it is dying a quick and painless death. Thoughts and opinions are most welcome!


Kev
oxox


#AtomicLove
1 Comment

    Author

    Kev Atomic

    Archives

    July 2014
    April 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture